全部题库 / 公共英语四级 / 试题详情
单选题 公共英语四级
2018-03-03

Frontotemporal dementia is a disease

A.identified with loss of memory.
B.causing damage to certain parts of the brain.
C.whose patients may develop new talents.
D.whose symptoms are similar to those of Alzheimer’s patients.

参考答案

C

答案解析

该题为细节题。根据第三段第三句“Both had undamaged memories,but displayed the sorts of defect…”可知额颞痴呆症患者的记忆都没有受损,选项A不符合文意;根据第二段第一句“Frontotemporal dementia,a disease usually found with old people,is caused,as its name suggests,by damage to the front and sides of the brain.”可知,额颞痴呆症是由大脑前部和侧面的损坏引起的,而选项B表达的意思是额颞痴呆症会引起大脑某些部分的损毁,与文章原意因果颠倒;根据第五段第一句“This kind of change in musical taste was not seen in any of the Alzheimer’s pafients,and thus appears to be specific to those with frontotemporal dementia.”可知,阿尔茨海默氏病患并没有出现这种音乐品味的变化,仅仅是那些患有额颞痴呆的病患有这样的症状,选项D所述额颞痴呆的症状与阿尔茨海默氏病症状相似的说法是错误的;根据第五段第二句“And other studies have remarked on how frontotemporal-de-mentia patients sometimes gain new talents.”可知,有研究表明额颞痴呆症有可能使患者获得新的才能,故选C。

你可能感兴趣的试题

A.man’s desire to seek novel experience.
B.the damage to the left part of the brain.
C.the shift of predominance from the right lobe to the left.
D.the weakening of some part of the nervous system.
2 根据下面资料,回答题
Who´s to blame? The trail of responsibility goes beyond poor maintenance of British railways,say industry critics. Stingy governments--both Labor and Tory--have cut down on investments in trains and rails. In the mid-1990s a Conservative government pushed through the sale of the entire subsidy-guzzling rail network. Operating franchises were parceled out among private companies and a separate firm, Railtrack, was awarded ownership of the tracks and stations. In the future, the theory ran back then, the private sector could pay for any improvements--with a little help from the state--and take the blame for any failings.
Today surveys show that travelers believe privatization is one of the reasons for the railways´s failures. They ask whether the pursuit of profits is compatible with guaranteeing safety. Worse,splitting the network between companies has made coordination nearly impossible. "The railway was torn apart at privatization and the structure that was put in place was...designed, if we are honest,to maximize the proceeds to the Treasury ," said Railtrack boss Gerald Corbett before resigning last month in the wake of the Hatfield crash.
Generally, the contrasts with mainland Europe are stark. Over the past few decades the Germans,French and Italians have invested 50 percent more than the British in transportation infrastructure. As a result, a web of high-speed trains now crisscross the Continent, funded by governments willing to commit state funds to major capital projects. Spain is currently planning 1,000 miles of new high-speed track. In France superfast trains already shuttle between all major cities, often on dedicated lines. And in Britain? When the Eurostar trains that link Paris, London and Brussels emerge from the Channel Tunnel onto British soil and join the crowded local network, they must slow down from 186 mph to a maximum of 100 mph--and they usually have to go even slower.
For once, the government is listening. After all, commuters are voters, too. In a pre-vote spending spree, the government has committed itself to huge investment in transportation, as well as education and the public health service. Over the next 10 years, the railways should get an extra £60 billion, partly through higher subsidies to the private companies. As Blair ackoowledged last month, "Britain has been underinvested in and invesWnent is central to Britain´s future. " You don´t have to tell the 3 million passengers who use the railways every day. Last week trains to Darlington were an hour late--and crawling at Locomotion No.1 speeds.
In the first paragraph.the author tries to
A.trace the tragedy to its defective origin.
B.remind people of Britain’s glorious past.
C.explain the failure of Britain’s rail network.
D.call for impartiality in assessing the situation.
A.its structural design.
B.the pursuit of profit.
C.its inefficient network.
D.the lack of safety guarantees.