单选题
公共英语四级
2018-03-03
根据下面资料,回答题
Who´s to blame? The trail of responsibility goes beyond poor maintenance of British railways,say industry critics. Stingy governments--both Labor and Tory--have cut down on investments in trains and rails. In the mid-1990s a Conservative government pushed through the sale of the entire subsidy-guzzling rail network. Operating franchises were parceled out among private companies and a separate firm, Railtrack, was awarded ownership of the tracks and stations. In the future, the theory ran back then, the private sector could pay for any improvements--with a little help from the state--and take the blame for any failings.
Today surveys show that travelers believe privatization is one of the reasons for the railways´s failures. They ask whether the pursuit of profits is compatible with guaranteeing safety. Worse,splitting the network between companies has made coordination nearly impossible. "The railway was torn apart at privatization and the structure that was put in place was...designed, if we are honest,to maximize the proceeds to the Treasury ," said Railtrack boss Gerald Corbett before resigning last month in the wake of the Hatfield crash.
Generally, the contrasts with mainland Europe are stark. Over the past few decades the Germans,French and Italians have invested 50 percent more than the British in transportation infrastructure. As a result, a web of high-speed trains now crisscross the Continent, funded by governments willing to commit state funds to major capital projects. Spain is currently planning 1,000 miles of new high-speed track. In France superfast trains already shuttle between all major cities, often on dedicated lines. And in Britain? When the Eurostar trains that link Paris, London and Brussels emerge from the Channel Tunnel onto British soil and join the crowded local network, they must slow down from 186 mph to a maximum of 100 mph--and they usually have to go even slower.
For once, the government is listening. After all, commuters are voters, too. In a pre-vote spending spree, the government has committed itself to huge investment in transportation, as well as education and the public health service. Over the next 10 years, the railways should get an extra £60 billion, partly through higher subsidies to the private companies. As Blair ackoowledged last month, "Britain has been underinvested in and invesWnent is central to Britain´s future. " You don´t have to tell the 3 million passengers who use the railways every day. Last week trains to Darlington were an hour late--and crawling at Locomotion No.1 speeds.
In the first paragraph.the author tries to
A.trace the tragedy to its defective origin.
B.remind people of Britain’s glorious past.
C.explain the failure of Britain’s rail network.
D.call for impartiality in assessing the situation.
参考答案
C
答案解析
参考译文
该责怪谁呢?工业评论家说道,责任远远不只在于英国铁路的养护不善。吝啬的英国政府,不论是工党执政还是保守党执政,都削减了火车和铁路的投资。在二十世纪九十年代中期,有一届保守党政府促成变卖了整个非常耗用补贴的铁路网。经营权由几家私人公司瓜分,而铁路和车站的所有权属于英国铁路公司。此后,按照当时的做法,私营部门需要承担铁路改善的费用,政府仅仅给予一点帮助,私营部门需要对任何的失误承担责任。
如今,调查显示乘客认为铁路的失误都应该归因于铁路的私有化。
他们质问是否可以兼顾追逐利益和保障安全。更糟糕的是,将整个铁路网分割给几家公司经营使得事情变得更加难以协调。上月,英国铁路公司的老板杰拉尔·德科贝特因为赫特福德事故而辞职,他曾说过:“老实说,铁路系统因为私有化而四分五裂,铁路结构的设计也是基于最大化地增加财政收入。”
一般来说,英国铁路与欧洲大陆铁路的对比很明显。在过去的几十年,德国、法国和意大利在交通运输基础建设上比英国多投资了50%。
因此,目前一个由政府出资的高速的铁路网在欧洲大陆上纵横交错,这些政府愿意把国家资金投入到首都重大项目的建设。西班牙目前正在计划建一条1,000英里的新型高速铁路。在法国,超高速列车已经穿梭于大城市之间,通常都是专线。那么在英国呢?连接巴黎、伦敦和布鲁塞尔的欧洲之星列车从英吉利海峡隧道进入英国大地,汇入拥挤的英国铁路线时,车速不得不从每小时186英里降低到最高每小时100英里——有时候甚至更慢。
终于有一次,英国政府愿意听取意见。毕竟,乘客也是选民。在一次选举前的消费热潮时,政府承诺会对交通、教育、公共健康服务方面进行大量的投资。在之后的十年问,政府将通过对私有公司的部分高额补贴对铁路再追加六百亿英镑的投资。正如布莱尔上个月承认的:“英国投资不足,而投资是英国未来的关键。”你不必把这些话告诉三百万每天坐火车的乘客。上周,去达灵顿的火车晚点了一个小时——以“第一机车”的速度缓慢爬行。
答案及解析
该题为细节题。在第一段中,作者回顾了英国铁路的现状产生的根源,即铁路的私有化。根据第一段第一、二句“Who is to blame?The trail of responsibility goes beyond poor maintenance of British railways,say industry critics.”可知,英国铁路系统不健全,铁路速度慢的原因不只在于英国铁路的养护不善。下文对其原因作出了具体的解释,故选C。
该责怪谁呢?工业评论家说道,责任远远不只在于英国铁路的养护不善。吝啬的英国政府,不论是工党执政还是保守党执政,都削减了火车和铁路的投资。在二十世纪九十年代中期,有一届保守党政府促成变卖了整个非常耗用补贴的铁路网。经营权由几家私人公司瓜分,而铁路和车站的所有权属于英国铁路公司。此后,按照当时的做法,私营部门需要承担铁路改善的费用,政府仅仅给予一点帮助,私营部门需要对任何的失误承担责任。
如今,调查显示乘客认为铁路的失误都应该归因于铁路的私有化。
他们质问是否可以兼顾追逐利益和保障安全。更糟糕的是,将整个铁路网分割给几家公司经营使得事情变得更加难以协调。上月,英国铁路公司的老板杰拉尔·德科贝特因为赫特福德事故而辞职,他曾说过:“老实说,铁路系统因为私有化而四分五裂,铁路结构的设计也是基于最大化地增加财政收入。”
一般来说,英国铁路与欧洲大陆铁路的对比很明显。在过去的几十年,德国、法国和意大利在交通运输基础建设上比英国多投资了50%。
因此,目前一个由政府出资的高速的铁路网在欧洲大陆上纵横交错,这些政府愿意把国家资金投入到首都重大项目的建设。西班牙目前正在计划建一条1,000英里的新型高速铁路。在法国,超高速列车已经穿梭于大城市之间,通常都是专线。那么在英国呢?连接巴黎、伦敦和布鲁塞尔的欧洲之星列车从英吉利海峡隧道进入英国大地,汇入拥挤的英国铁路线时,车速不得不从每小时186英里降低到最高每小时100英里——有时候甚至更慢。
终于有一次,英国政府愿意听取意见。毕竟,乘客也是选民。在一次选举前的消费热潮时,政府承诺会对交通、教育、公共健康服务方面进行大量的投资。在之后的十年问,政府将通过对私有公司的部分高额补贴对铁路再追加六百亿英镑的投资。正如布莱尔上个月承认的:“英国投资不足,而投资是英国未来的关键。”你不必把这些话告诉三百万每天坐火车的乘客。上周,去达灵顿的火车晚点了一个小时——以“第一机车”的速度缓慢爬行。
答案及解析
该题为细节题。在第一段中,作者回顾了英国铁路的现状产生的根源,即铁路的私有化。根据第一段第一、二句“Who is to blame?The trail of responsibility goes beyond poor maintenance of British railways,say industry critics.”可知,英国铁路系统不健全,铁路速度慢的原因不只在于英国铁路的养护不善。下文对其原因作出了具体的解释,故选C。
你可能感兴趣的试题
A.its structural design.
B.the pursuit of profit.
C.its inefficient network.
D.the lack of safety guarantees.
A.for the benefit of commuters.
B.to the advantage of the government.
C.for the effect of better coordination.
D.as a replacement of the private system.
A.trains in Britain can run at 100 mph at least.
B.Britain should build more express fines.
C.rails in Britain need further privatization.
D.British railway is left a long way behind.