公共英语四级
Text 4
In the late years of the nineteenth century, "capital" and "labour" were enlarging and perfecting their rival organisations on modern lines. Many an old firm was replaced by a limited liability company with a bureaucracy of salaried managers. The change met the technical requirements of the new age by engaging a large professional element and prevented the decline in efficiency that so commonly spoiled the fortunes of family firms in the second and third generation after the energetic founders. It was moreover a step away from individual initiative, towards collectivism and municipal and state-owned business. The railway companies, though still private business managed for the benefit of shareholders, were very unlike old family business. Meanwhile the great municipalities went into business to supply lighting, trams and other services to the taxpayers.
The growth of the limited liability company and municipal business had important consequences. Such large, impersonal manipulation of capital and industry greatly increased the numbers and importance of shareholders as a class, an element in national life representing irresponsible wealth detached from the land and the duties of the landowners;and almost equally detached from the responsible management of business. During the nineteenth century, America, Africa, India,Australia and parts of Europe were being developed by British capital, and British shareholders were thus enriched by the world's movement towards industrialisation. Towns like Bournemouth and Eastbourne sprang up to house large "comfortable" classes who had retired on their incomes, and who had no relation to the rest of the community except that of drawing dividends and occasionally attending a shareholders' meeting to dictate their orders to the management. On the other hand "shareholding" meant leisure and freedom which was used by many of the later Victorians for the highest purpose of a great civilisation.
The "shareholders" as such had no knowledge of the lives, thoughts or needs of employees in the company in which they held shares, and their influence on the relations of capital and labour was not good. The paid manager acting for the company was in more direct relation with the workers and their demands, but even he had seldom familiar personal knowledge of the workmen which the employers had often had under the more patriarchal system of the old family business. Indeed the mere size of operations and the number of workmen involved rendered such personal relations impossible. Fortunately, however, the increasing power and organisation of the trade unions, at least in all skilled trades, enabled the workmen to meet on equal terms the managers of the companies who employed them. The cruel discipline of the strike and lockout taught the two parties to respect each other's strength and understand the value of fair negotiation.
The author says that old family firms_
有限责任公司和地方企业的发展有着重要的影响。资本和工业这种大规模的缺乏人情味的运作大大增加了持股人的数量以及他们作为一个阶级的重要性。这个阶级成为国家生活中一个代表无责任财富的要素．他们没有土地，不用承担土地所有者的责任；同样他们也不用承担企业经营的责任。在19世纪，美洲、非洲、印度、澳大利亚和欧洲的部分地区依靠英国的资本得以发展，而英国持股人也因此从世界工业化运动中获得利益。诸如伯恩茅斯和伊斯特本这样的城市很快被建设起来供那些富有的阶级居住，他们不再工作，靠他们的收入生活，他们除了领取分红和偶尔参加一下股东会议向管理部门发号施令以外与社区没什么关系。从另一个方面看，“持股”意味着闲暇和自由，维多利亚晚期很多人把这些闲暇和自由当作他们的伟大文化的最高目的。
这些“持股人”对他们所持股的公司中雇员的生活、思想和需要一无所知。而他们对劳资关系的影响也是很不好的。代表公司的受雇经理人和工人以及他们的需求有更直接的关系，但即使是他也很少像通常处在旧式家族企业家长制度下的雇主那样熟悉工人们的私人状况。其实，单是公司运作的规模和牵涉到的工人的数量就决定了这样的人际关系是不可能的。但是幸运的是，工会日益增长的力量和日益扩大的组织，至少在技术性行业里是如此，使工人能够与雇佣他们的公司的经理平起平坐。罢工和闭厂的残酷磨练教会了劳资双方尊重彼此的力量和理解平等协商的价值。
答案及解析
【解析】作者说旧式的家族企业：选项A：旧式的家族企业被年轻一代毁掉。文章第一段是提到了，但这不是文章所要说的重点。
文章主要在谈有限责任公司和股东。选项B：IH式的家族企业缺少个人主动性。很显然不正确，IH式的家族企业的创始人是积极肯干的，只是第二
你可能感兴趣的试题
A．the separation of capital from managemen
B．the ownership of capital by manager
C．the emergence of capital and labour as two classe
D．the participation of shareholders in land ownershi
A．some countries developed quickly because of the emergence of the limited liability companie
B．the tide of industralisation would widely benefit British shareholders greatl
C．shareholders contributed a lot to the fast growth of the British econom
D．the system of shareholding impaired the management of modern companie
A．shareholders often cast negative influence on the well-being of worker
B．owners of traditional firms enjoyed a good relationship with their employee
C．limited liability companies were too large to run smoothl
D．trade unions had a positive role on workers and the managemen
最新试题
Read the following text(s) and write an essay to 1) summari
第60题答案
第59题答案
第58题答案
第57题答案
根据下面资料，回答题 56) Fathers exposed to poisonous substances are
第55题选
第54题选
第53题选
第52题选