What might be caused by the dispute over the distribution of an unprec-考呗网

英语六级

填空题What might be caused by the dispute over the distribution of an unprecedented huge amount of money within a community?

参考答案：暂无进入在线模考

【设题处】因果处设题
【答案】Internal rifts．
【解析】题干考查社区对大量金钱分配的争议导致的结果。由题干中的．Dispute　over the distribution可将答案定位在第五段。大量的金钱使法规失去其效力，最后可能导致内部分裂(internal rifts)、意见不和或战争。

你可能感兴趣的试题

1Which two areas are most prominent improved as the result of the wealth brought by mining?

点击查看答案进入在线模考

2Who are equally polluted but benefit less from the prosperity of mining?

点击查看答案进入在线模考

3Section
Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked [A], [B], [C] and [D].You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.
Passage One
Questions are based on the following passage.
　　Opinion polls are now beginning to show a reluctant consensus that, whoever is to blame and whatever happens from now on, high unemployment is probably here to stay. This means we shall have to find ways of sharing the available employment more widely.
　　But we need to go further. We must ask some fundamental questions about the future of work. Should we continue to treat employment as the norm? Should we not rather encourage many other ways for self-respecting people to work? Should we not create conditions in which many of us can work for ourselves, rather than for an employer? Should we not aim to revive the household and neighborhood, as well as the factory and the office, as centres of production and work?
The industrial age has been the only period of human history in which most people's work has taken the form of jobs. The industrial age may now be coming to an end, and some of the changes in work patterns which it brought may have to be reversed. This seems a daunting thought. But, in fact, it could offer the prospect of a better future for work. Universal employment, as its history shows, has not meant economic freedom.
　　Employment became widespread when the enclosures of the 17th and 18th centuries made many people dependent on paid work by depriving them of the use of the land, and thus of the means to provide a living for themselves. Then the factory system destroyed the cottage industries and removed work from people's homes. Later, as transport improved, first by rail then by road,people commuted longer distances to their places of employment, until, eventually, many people's work lost all connection with their home lives and the places in which they lived.
　　Meanwhile, employment put women at a disadvantage as men and women had shared the productive work of the household and village community in pre-industrial times, while now it becomes customary for the husband to go out to paid employment, leaving the unpaid work of the home and family to his wife. Also as employment became the dominant form of work, young people and old people were excluded a problem now, as more teenagers become frustrated at school and more retired people want to live active lives.
All this may now have to change. The time has certainly come to switch some effort and resources away from the Utopian goal of creating jobs for all, to the urgent practical task of helping many people to manage without full-time jobs.
Research carried out in recent opinion polls

点击查看答案进入在线模考