单选题
英语六级
2016-11-30
Questions are based on the following passage.
When most people think of the word "education", they think of a pupil as a sort of animate (有生命的) sausage container. Into this empty container, the teachers are supposed to stuff"education".
But genuine education, as Socrates knew more than two thousand years ago, is not inserting the stuffing of information into a person, but rather eliciting knowledge from him; it is the drawing out of what is in the mind.
"The most important part of education," once wrote William Ernest Hocking, the distinguished Harvard philosopher, "is this instruction of a man in what he has inside of him."
And, as Edith Hamilton has reminded us, Socrates never said, "I know, learn from me." He said, rather, "Look into your own selves and find the spark of truth that God has put into every heart and that only you can develop to flame."
In the dialogue called the "Meno", Socrates takes an ignorant slave boy, without a day of schooling, and proves to the amazed observers that the boy really "knows" geometry -- because the principles of geometry are already in his mind, waiting to be called out.
So many of the discussions and controversies about the content of education are useless and inconclusive because they are concerned with what should "go into" the student rather than with what should be "taken out", and how this can best be done. The college student who once said to me, after a lecture, "I spend so much time studying that I don't have a chance to learn anything," was expressing his dissatisfaction with sausage-container view of education.
He was being so stuffed with varied facts, with such an indigestible mass of material, that he had no time (and was given no encouragement) to draw on his own resources, to use his own mind for analysing and synthesizing and evaluating this material.
Education, to have any meaning beyond the purpose of creating well-informed dunces (劣学生), must elicit from the pupil what is potential in every human being -- the rules of reason, the inner knowledge of what is proper for men to be and do, the ability to assess evidence and come to conclusions that can generally be agreed on by all open minds and worm hearts.
Pupils are more like oysters (牡蛎) than sausages. The job of teaching is not to stuff them and then seal them up, but to help them open and reveal the riches within. There are pearls in each of us, if only we knew how to cultivate them with enthusiasm and insistence.
What did Socrates say about genuine education?
A.Education should draw students' attention.
B.Education demands to absorb much knowledge.
C.Education requires explicit knowledge transfer.
D.Education aims to develop students' potentials.
参考答案
D
答案解析
大多数人在想到“教育”这个词的时候会把学生想成是有生命的容器j老师应该往这个空容器中装满“教育”。
【51】但是真正的教育就像苏格拉底在两千多年前所知道的那样,不是给人灌输信息,而是从他身上激发出知识;是诱导出头脑中已有的内容。哈佛大学著名哲学家威廉·欧内斯特·霍金曾经写道:“教育最重要的部分是对一个人的内在东西的指导。”
【52】正如伊迪丝·汉密尔顿所提醒的那样,苏格拉底从来没有说过:“我知道,向我学习吧。”他只是说:“审视你自己,找到上帝在每个人中播下的真理的火花,只有你才能将这个火花变成火焰。”
【53】在对话《关诺篇》中,苏格拉底的谈话对象是一个没有文化的奴隶男孩,这个孩子没有上过一天学,但却让惊奇的观察者们相信这个孩子确实“懂得”几何学——因为几何原理已经在他的脑中,只墨查等着被唤出来。
因此,许多关于教育内容的讨论和争辩都是没有用也不会有所结果的,因为他们关心的是应该向学生“输入”什么,而不是应该从中“提取”什么,以及怎样才能做到最好,一位大学生曾经在一次讲座后对我说:“我把这么多的时间都花在了学习上,以至于我没有机会去学什么东西,”他所表达的就是对这种填鸭式教育观点的不满。他被各种各样的事实和如此多难以消化的东西塞满了,以至于他没有时间(也没有得到鼓励)去提取自己的思想,去用自己的思维分析、合成和评估这些东西。
【54】教育,如果要有超越以培养博学傻瓜为目的的任何意义的话,就必须从学生中激发出每个人类都具有的潜质——合理的规则,关于什么适合人的存在以及什么适合人去做的内在认知,评估证据和得出能被所有思想开明和内心腐化的人一致认同的结论的能力。
【55】学生们更像是牡蛎,而不是香肠。教育的任务不是将他们塞满,然后封住,而是帮助他们开启和展现里面所富含的东西。我们每个人里面都有珍珠,只要我们知道如何用热情和坚持去培养它们。
【定位】根据题干中的Socrates和genuine education可以将本题出处定位于第2段,
【解析】D.。第2段提到,……真正的教育……是从他身上激发出知识……是诱导出头脑中已有的内容,D.中的develop students’ potentials(开发学生的潜能)是对此的同义转述,故答案为D。A是针对the drawing out of what is in the mind设的干扰项;文中提到真正的教育需要从学生那里eliciting knowledge,B.中仅提到demands to absorb much knowledge(要求吸收许多知识),与文意不符,故排除;C.中的 explicit(详细的)knowledge transfer是针对eliciting(引出)knowledge在形式上设的干扰项。
【51】但是真正的教育就像苏格拉底在两千多年前所知道的那样,不是给人灌输信息,而是从他身上激发出知识;是诱导出头脑中已有的内容。哈佛大学著名哲学家威廉·欧内斯特·霍金曾经写道:“教育最重要的部分是对一个人的内在东西的指导。”
【52】正如伊迪丝·汉密尔顿所提醒的那样,苏格拉底从来没有说过:“我知道,向我学习吧。”他只是说:“审视你自己,找到上帝在每个人中播下的真理的火花,只有你才能将这个火花变成火焰。”
【53】在对话《关诺篇》中,苏格拉底的谈话对象是一个没有文化的奴隶男孩,这个孩子没有上过一天学,但却让惊奇的观察者们相信这个孩子确实“懂得”几何学——因为几何原理已经在他的脑中,只墨查等着被唤出来。
因此,许多关于教育内容的讨论和争辩都是没有用也不会有所结果的,因为他们关心的是应该向学生“输入”什么,而不是应该从中“提取”什么,以及怎样才能做到最好,一位大学生曾经在一次讲座后对我说:“我把这么多的时间都花在了学习上,以至于我没有机会去学什么东西,”他所表达的就是对这种填鸭式教育观点的不满。他被各种各样的事实和如此多难以消化的东西塞满了,以至于他没有时间(也没有得到鼓励)去提取自己的思想,去用自己的思维分析、合成和评估这些东西。
【54】教育,如果要有超越以培养博学傻瓜为目的的任何意义的话,就必须从学生中激发出每个人类都具有的潜质——合理的规则,关于什么适合人的存在以及什么适合人去做的内在认知,评估证据和得出能被所有思想开明和内心腐化的人一致认同的结论的能力。
【55】学生们更像是牡蛎,而不是香肠。教育的任务不是将他们塞满,然后封住,而是帮助他们开启和展现里面所富含的东西。我们每个人里面都有珍珠,只要我们知道如何用热情和坚持去培养它们。
【定位】根据题干中的Socrates和genuine education可以将本题出处定位于第2段,
【解析】D.。第2段提到,……真正的教育……是从他身上激发出知识……是诱导出头脑中已有的内容,D.中的develop students’ potentials(开发学生的潜能)是对此的同义转述,故答案为D。A是针对the drawing out of what is in the mind设的干扰项;文中提到真正的教育需要从学生那里eliciting knowledge,B.中仅提到demands to absorb much knowledge(要求吸收许多知识),与文意不符,故排除;C.中的 explicit(详细的)knowledge transfer是针对eliciting(引出)knowledge在形式上设的干扰项。
你可能感兴趣的试题
A.should learn knowledge from their teachers with modesty
B.should investigate what the God has put in their hearts
C.were encouraged to discover the truth themselves
D.were required to find the spark to flame
A.the boy is a genius with rich knowledge
B.schooling is unnecessary to young people
C.clever people can learn geometry by themselves
D.knowledge exists in people's mind waiting to be explored
A.well-educated but stupid students
B.intelligent and efficient students
C.talented but incapable students
D.knowledgeable but inactive students