考研英语

单选题 The discovery of the Higgs boson is a typical case which involves

A.controversies over the recipients’ status.
B.the joint effort of modern researchers.
C.legitimate concerns over the new prizes.
D.the demonstration of research findings.

参考答案:D进入在线模考
The discovery of the Higgs boson is a typical case which involves",难度较大,考察到长难句的知识。对应原文为"Foundation's limit of three recipients per prize, each of whom must still be living, has long been outgrown by the collaborative nature of modern research-as will be demonstrated by the inevitable row over who is ignored when it comes to acknowledging the discovery of the Higgs boson."考察点是as 引导的非限制性定语从句及其指代,以及单词row(该单词在2013第二篇第四段首句出现过,表示争吵),选择[A]controversies over the recipients' status。当然,如果该题题干中的 "involves" 改成"demonstrates", 则题目就成为传统的例证题,答案则改选为: [B]the joint effort of modern researchers.   (本解析由安宝蓝提供)

你可能感兴趣的试题

1 According to Paragraph 4,which of the following is true of the Nobels?

A.Their endurance has done justice to them.
B.Their legitimacy has long been in dispute.
C.They are the most representative honor.
D.History has never cast doubt on them.

2 The author believes that the now awards are

A.acceptable despite the criticism.
B.harmful to the culture of research.
C.subject to undesirable changes.
D.unworthy of public attention.

3 Text 4
根据以下资料,回答题。
“The Heart of the Matter,” the just-released report by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS), deserves praise for affirming the importance of the humanities and social sciences to the prosperity and security of liberal democracy in America. Regrettably, however, the report’s failure to address the true nature of the crisis facing liberal education may cause more harm than good.
In 2010, leading congressional Democrats and Republicans sent letters to the AAAS asking that it identify actions that could be taken by “federal, state and local governments, universities, foundations, educators, individual benefactors and others” to “maintain national excellence in humanities and social scientific scholarship and education.” In response, the American Academy formed the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences. Among the commission’s 51 members are top-tier-university presidents, scholars, lawyers, judges, and business executives, as well as prominent figures from diplomacy, filmmaking, music and journalism.
The goals identified in the report are generally admirable. Because representative government presupposes an informed citizenry, the report supports full literacy; stresses the study of history and government, particularly American history and American government; and encourages the use of new digital technologies. To encourage innovation and competition, the report calls for increased investment in research, the crafting of coherent curricula that improve students’ ability to solve problems and communicate effectively in the 21st century, increased funding for teachers and the encouragement of scholars to bring their learning to bear on the great challenges of the day. The report also advocates greater study of foreign languages, international affairs and the expansion of study abroad programs.
Unfortunately, despite 2½ years in the making, "The Heart of the Matter" never gets to the heart of the matter: the illiberal nature of liberal education at our leading colleges and universities. The commission ignores that for several decades America's colleges and universities have produced graduates who don’t know the content and character of liberal education and are thus deprived of its benefits. Sadly, the spirit of inquiry once at home on campus has been replaced by the use of the humanities and social sciences as vehicles for publicizing “progressive,” or left-liberal propaganda.
Today, professors routinely treat the progressive interpretation of history and progressive public policy as the proper subject of study while portraying conservative or classical liberal ideas—such as free markets and self-reliance—as falling outside the boundaries of routine, and sometimes legitimate, intellectual investigation.
The AAAS displays great enthusiasm for liberal education. Yet its report may well set back reform by obscuring the depth and breadth of the challenge that Congress asked it to illuminate.
According to Paragraph 1, what is the author’s attitude toward the AAAS’s report?

A.Critical
B.Appreciative
C.Contemptuous
D.Tolerant