懂题库 .com
DONGTIKU.COM
全部题库 / 考研英语 / 试题详情
简答题 考研英语
2013-10-31

Directions：
Write an essay of l60—200 words based Oil the following drawin9．In your essay，you should
1)describe the drawing briefly．
2)explain its intended meanin9，and then
3)give your comments．
You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET．(20 points)

查看答案及解析 进入在线模考

参考答案

暂无

答案解析

As is vividly indicated in the caricature above，plenty of people pursue the civil servants，and ignore the positions of the teacher in the rural areas．Obviously，they are tending to be an official，not entering the service business--just like to be a teacher.
  Simple as the picture is，it does reveal certain disturbing social phenomenon，that is，with the changing of the people’S individual opinions：if one is an officer，even more，a small official in a government,one will have a lot of power．Maybe one can get much money，more beauties．and more honors．So they do not want to be a teacher，no money，no future．But these behaviors not only harmful，but also damaging for the society，therefore government must give more attention to this phenomenon．
so．what should be done to arrest and reserve this disturbing phenomenon?For one thing，the press is obliged to make good efforts to publicize the importance of fundamental education．For another thin9，the central authority is expected to make strict rules and regulations fight against corruption．Still．a proper guidance mechanism is supposed to be built up without delay．Only in this way can the society develop steadily．

你可能感兴趣的试题

1 根据下列材料，请回答题
　　Imagine a world where your doctor could help you avoid sickness，using knowledge of your genes as well as how you live your life．Or where he would prescribe drugs he knew would work and not have debilitating side-effects．
　　Such a future is arriving faster than most realise：genetic tests are already widely used to identify patients who will be helped or harmed by certain drugs．And three years ago，in the face of a torrent of new scientific data，a number of new companies set themselves up to interpret this information for customers．Through shop fronts on the internet，anyone could order a testing kit．spit into a tube and send off their DNA—with results downloaded privately at home．Already customers can find out their response to many common medications，such as antivirals and blood-thinning agents．They can also explore their genetic likelihood of developing deep—vein thrombosis，skin cancer or glaucoma．
　　The industry has been subject to conflicting criticisms．On the one hand，it stands accused of offering information too dangerous to trust to consumers；on the other it is charged with peddling irrelevant，misleading nonsense．For some rare disorders，such as Huntington’s and Tay—Sachs，genetic information is a diagnosis．But most diseases are more complicated and involve several genes，or an environmental component，or both．Someone’s chance of getting skin cancer，for example，will depend on whether he worships the sun as well as on his genes．
　　America’s Government Accountability Office(GAO)report also revealed what the industry has openly admitted for years：that results of disease—prediction tests from different companies sometimes conflict with one another，because there is no industry—wide agreement on standard lifetime risks．
　　Governments hate this sort of anarchy and America’s，in particular，is considering regulation．But three things argue against wholesale regulation．First，the level of interference needs to be based on the level of risk a test represents．The government does not need to be involved if someone decides to trace his ancestry or discover what type of earwax he has．Second．the laws on fraud should be sufficient to deal with the snake—oil salesmen who promise to predict，say，whether a child might be a sporting champion．And third，science is changing very fast．Fairly soon，a customer’s whole genome will be sequenced，not merely the parts thought to be medically relevant that the testing companies now concentrate on，and he will then be able to crank the results through open—source interpretation software downloadable from anywhere on the planet．That will create problems，but the only way to stop that happening would be to make it illegal for someone to have his genome sequenced--and nobody is seriously suggesting that illiberal rpstriction.
　　Instead，then，of reacting in a hostile fashion to the trend for people to take genetic tests，governments should be asking themselves how they can make best use of this new source of information．Restricting access to tests that inform people about bad reactions to drugs could do harm．The real question is not who controls access，but how to minimise the risks and maximise the rewards of a useful revolution．
Current genetic tests are able to______．
A．identify customers’response to common medications
B．diagnose customers’health state in the future
C．judge customers’genetic inclination to some diseases
D．find the cause for some diseases，such as glaucoma
查看解析 在线模考
2 It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 to Paragraph 4 that______．
A．Huntington’S and Tay．Sach can be diagnosed by genetic information because they are rare disorders
B．someone who has a lower—than—average genetic risk of skin disease can suffer aterrainal skin cancer
C．genetic test companies have tried to justify the uniqueness of their disease-predictionresults
D．customers have to order genetic test online because it is illegal in real life
查看解析 在线模考
3 The author seems to suggest that the restriction prohibiting customers from having their genome sequenced is______．
A．inhuman and unethical
B．inhuman but legal
C．illiberal but necessary
D．illiberal and oppressive
查看解析 在线模考